| Who is Online ? | In total there are 6 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 5 Guests :: 1 Bot BrianMost users ever online was 23 on Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:34 pm |
| November 2009 | | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|
| | | | | | | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | | 30 | | | | | | | Calendar |
|
| | |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Andrew

Number of posts: 72 Cap Badge: RAOC Places Served: Bicester-Soltau-Canada-Kineton-Paderborn-Osnabruck-Donnington-Civy Strasse. Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:27 am | |
| Being RAOC we didn't have the GPMG, but I did enjoy the LMG or Bren. Yes an old weapon but very satisfying to pull the butt into the shoulder and squirt rounds off (in bursts of three to five of course) down the range. One of the few weapons I've enjoyed firing more than the LMG was the .30 Browning, like the LMG an old weapon but it gave the firer bags of confidence...well I thought so anyway  |
|  | | nobby clark

Number of posts: 92 Age: 62 Localisation: manchester Cap Badge: 1R.Hamps / RAOC Places Served: baor-Hong Kong-Malaya-Borneo-Belize-F.I.-Cyprus-N.I.-UK. Registration date: 2008-04-07
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:50 pm | |
| My first time firing the old SMLE in shirt sleeve order I thought I had been kicked by a horse, then I fired a PIAT ... holy jesus I don't know what went further, the shell or me (backwards) .. but then having to reload it, I thought I would get a hernia .. Ciphers Know the feeling,not with a PIAT but I once and only bloody once had the dubious pleasure of firing a 94 (Energa) grenade on Sennelager ranges,oh dear,thought I'd lost my right hand with the kick of yon Ballasite cartridge,no sympathy though,told I should have held it tighter,as I was white knuckled gripping the SLR I dont see how that would have been possible. |
|  | | wrinkles

Number of posts: 43 Age: 66 Localisation: Birmingham, UK Cap Badge: Mercian Brigade, 1st Bn Worc Rgt Places Served: Uk, Honduras,Tripoli, BAOR, UK, Tobruk, Gibraltar, short stints in Canada, USA, Barbados & Dominica Registration date: 2007-05-15
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:22 pm | |
| Mmmm! I agree Nobby those 94's were wicked things to fire. The sights were a joke, if you got yourself at the twisted angle which allowed you to use them, the recoil would make you pay dearly. Being Regimental signals we used the Drill rounds to lay D10 telephone cable across "Obstacles" It, more often than not, fell on me as signals NCO to demonstrate to the trainees, not a job I enjoyed. Firing the 94 grenade is bad enough but a drill round with a pack of cable attached is a different animal, and a bloody dangerous one at that. I saw, too late to stop him, one pillock stand astride the cable as he fired, the resulting friction cut clean through his combats before I got him off it. Although he had a nasty burn he was lucky to escape with his jewels intact. Another time, on exercise, The Signal officer of all people was on the other side of a "River", in plain view, assessing accuracy of the shot whilst the shooters were vying with one another as to who could get the closest to him. I decided I should call a halt when one declared "get close %%$£%$" from here I can nail the twat". I suppose he was safe enough 'cos it was almost impossible to hit the target with the bloody things. OH! happy days _________________ If it aint broken then fix it 'til it is
Sex is evil, sex is sin, sin is forgiven so stick it back in
|
|  | | donald
Number of posts: 125 Age: 80 Cap Badge: 1st The Royal Dragoons - The Blues and Royals (RHG/D) Places Served: UK,BOAR,Egypt Registration date: 2008-04-04
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:00 pm | |
| Ah yes - the old PIAT - I remember it well and fired it quite a few times,but never in anger.And re-cocking that spring was definately a job for Charles Atlas.Brings back happy memories of the .303 rifle,of which I was a good shot and won the Regtl Rifle competition on the 3 occasions when we managed a small arms meeting.And drill with a rifle,then there is only one weapon - the good old Lee-Enfield! ----- Don |
|  | | Hardrations

Number of posts: 168 Localisation: Winnipeg Manitoba Canada Cap Badge: RC Sigs (RTG Op) / CF Logistics (Cook) Places Served: Germany, Egypt, Cyprus, CFS Alert and lots of other strange places Registration date: 2007-12-16
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:09 am | |
| The .303 was indestructible. Never been issued one, though I did own one and the carbine version to. All over the middle east I would see them being still used by various forces, police and security people. The last one I owned now hangs on the wall at the Army Navy on Empress St in Winnipeg with appropiate spike bayonet. The bayonet came of a dead Greek-Cypriot soldier in 74. Also saw my last Thompson SMG's in use with the Greek Cypriot forces. Mind Ellen in Ellen's bar on Regina St in Nic. had one to. |
|  | | Mike_2817

Number of posts: 73 Localisation: North Yorkshire Cap Badge: RAOC Registration date: 2009-08-27
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:41 pm | |
| | Big_Mike wrote: | I posted this comment on another forum, but it sums up my feelings. 'The SLR or L1A1 was truly a good weapon. First produced in Belgium by FN, went around the world in different flavours, ours being L1A1 and L1A2. The first SLR being introduced to the British Army by 1956. Some special units had the Australian L2A2, but for most we had the L1A2 mine being fitted with the SUIT sights. We got the 25/25 round (Back-to-Back) mag. To my mind this was the best British weapon with grouping at 600 yds. A lethal weapon in the hands of a British soldier. The SLR is not an assault weapon, so the SA80 was born. Being a shorter weapon, with smaller rounds makes it handy for the combat soldier to use. But, as Ex. weapons instructor, no one can tell me that the shorter barrel and the 5.56mm, and mostly automatic fire is better than my L1A2 with the 7.62 round. As weapons they both have a role to play. I will just say that I could kill at 1000+ Mtrs with my weapon.
I have met a lot of soldiers back from Afghanistan that would dearly love the L1A2 back in service as a bridge between SA80 and GPMG. The SA80 Doesn't have the range or the accuracy, and the sights were better on the L1A2.
Mike in Germany |
SLR L1A1
The SLR was only ever issued as the L1A1 despite having several modifications over the years.
Heavy Barrel SLR v LMG
The Australians & New Zealand (L2A1) and the Canadians (C2A1) had a Heavy Barrel SLR with folding biped, issued as a support weapon at section/platoon level. The UK never adopted this version but opted for the 7.62mm converted BREN as the LMG L4A1 & variants (In fact the New Zealand Army prefered the LMG as well)
A few Australian Heavy Barrel SLR L2A1 were purchased by the British Army for Trails, but COD Donnington did not store or issue that many. They used a standard 20 round or a strengthened 30 round magazine designed to be used with it, and not the 30 round magazine issued with the LMG.
The British Army was in fact an early user of the M16 Rifle and ordered over 10,000 of them for use in Borneo, Malaya and later on by the Brigade of Gurkha's in Hong Kong. In fact we adopted it before the US Army did! Over the years many of these early M16 Models were traded in with Colt for more modern M16A1's and other models.
M16 v SA80
The Americans had as much problems with the early M16 as the British did with the L85 and it took a major re-build in the M16A1 and a re-education of troops in Vietnam on how to care for it after it was rumoured that the M16 did not require cleaning, and it was poorly maintained rifles that were a major problem in the early years.
One problem being that recruits were being trained with the M14 and being issued M16's in Theatre [A problem repeated with the L85A1 (SA80) in the British Army to start with]
If asked today what I would prefer? I would say a L85A2 as once you forget its early teething problems is a good weapon.
Pull up a sandbag
Being 'Old School' I liked the SLR, But being 'Rag & Oil' I prefered to carry a SMG or later a Browning Hi-Power [which I did in NI] becouse it was lighter. But give me an SLR if I had to use it.
. |
|  | | Chemist

Number of posts: 125 Age: 76 Localisation: Ireland Cap Badge: Civilian and National Service RAF Places Served: Pet Lab No4 Petroleum Depot Warendorf,Ord 2d Andover Registration date: 2009-07-15
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:07 pm | |
| Mike2817 Can I ask your opnion on gun cleaning fluids?. I had so many conflicting opinions when I was working.
Last edited by Chemist on Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:36 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|  | | Mike_2817

Number of posts: 73 Localisation: North Yorkshire Cap Badge: RAOC Registration date: 2009-08-27
 | |  | | 298HALL
Number of posts: 22 Age: 49 Localisation: Sherwood Forest Cap Badge: Royal Corps of Signals Places Served: Paderborn / Werl Registration date: 2008-04-17
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:28 pm | |
| I was leaving the army just as SA80 was entering service - and probably long before we Scalies were due to get our hands on it. But I have to say from everything I've heard and read, I would have preferred to carry the good old SLR had I stayed in longer. I've seen it described elsewhere as an "Elephant Gun" but it's one powerful rifle with a good range and plenty of stopping power. By comparison the SA80 just seems so, well plastic - and a bit of a pop gun ! |
|  | | 298HALL
Number of posts: 22 Age: 49 Localisation: Sherwood Forest Cap Badge: Royal Corps of Signals Places Served: Paderborn / Werl Registration date: 2008-04-17
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:22 am | |
| The reference to oils for weapon cleaning made me smile - a recollection came to mind from many years ago. While a very young Apprentice Tradesman in the AAC Harrogate we had a stint at Beckingham Ranges near Newark. The accomodation was old Nissen huts with an old fashioned stove to heat the place. As it was in the middle of winter and bloody freezing we were given permission to light the stoves. Of course all the bits of flanellette were simply thrown into the stove as we cleaned the SLR's and seemed to burn without any incident. Cue some smart alec who concluded "Gun oil doesn't burn well" and as we had a large plastic mug full of it once the cleaning was completed, proceeded to throw the contents into the stove. That led to one huge "explosion" as all the gun oil went up in a flash, sending 8 sqaddies flying in all directions and scorching the ceiling of the Nissen Hut ! |
|  | | Chemist

Number of posts: 125 Age: 76 Localisation: Ireland Cap Badge: Civilian and National Service RAF Places Served: Pet Lab No4 Petroleum Depot Warendorf,Ord 2d Andover Registration date: 2009-07-15
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:56 am | |
| Brasso did a good job of lighting coke stoves |
|  | | coley
Number of posts: 5 Registration date: 2009-09-13
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:38 am | |
| We were issued with the SLR in Germany about 1954 for trials, unfortunately there was not much ammo available for it at that time but it was easier to handle than the heavier 303. Lot's of changes since those days!! |
|  | | haggis

Number of posts: 6 Localisation: 4sqn RCT,Bunde Places Served: Bunde,4 sqn RCT,Northern Irelandx2 Registration date: 2009-11-11
 | Subject: Re: SLR / SA80 or M16! Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:43 pm | |
| SLR was my personal weapon while in BAOR,when I did my first tour of Northern Ireland I was issued with a Browning 9mm handgun,must admit I never got to use the SA80 as I was out when they were being introduced,I loved the SLR,simple but very powerfull,superb weapon |
|  | | |
| Page 3 of 3 | Goto page : 1, 2, 3 |
| | Permissions of this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |